The question about the 6 runs scored by the match
The question about the 6 runs scored by the match
That moment Stokes' ball has crossed the boundaries of the boundaries. Stokes is excited by the two hand highs. Kiwi wicketkeeper Tom Latham hands on the head
Needing the last 3 to win the match England needed 9 runs. In this situation, Martin Guptill threw Ben Bucknor's limelight with Ben Stokes. And the batsmen ran two runs and the umpire added 6 runs to the scoreboard. It started with debate
Pretense finals? World Cup is the best finale in the history of cricket? Whatever you can say, at the end of the game, but the real win cricket. Such an exciting match will definitely make the cricket market more prosperous. It is also a match on the stage like the World Cup final, where the run-out or wicket-keeper did not settle. At the end of the 100 overs, the two teams are equally equal. Even at the super end! Ah, what an epic final!
The Super Over was a match tie based on the boundaries of the title, where England won the title ahead. And the heart has won New Zealand However, the debut of debut was born in this match of tension, and it was in the last over of England's innings, with 1 run.
England needed 9 runs from the last 3 balls. Ben Stokes has wanted to steer the fourth ball of Trent Boult to a deep midwicket. Martin Guptill did very well. Maybe it was possible to run out of the stumps directly. He gave Dive to Stanka in the race. The ball crossed the third man with his bat! It was only after seeing the whole episode and the apologetic apology of Stokes, that he had no intentional hand because of the boundary. Absolutely unintentional happened.
In any case, in discussions with the team's fellow umpire, the umpire Kumar Dharmasena gave a signal of adding 6 runs (Runs 2 runs and 4 over) to the scoreboard. England have got the chance to return to the match. Turn to match 3 runs from 9 runs in the equation 2 came off 2 balls. Then the rest of history
But the debate is going on with the umpire's 6 runs. Analysts question from the media, that's not 6 runs, 5 runs? And this has given the scope for questioning of Article 19.8 of the Act of 'fielders overthrow or deliberate work'. It has been said, "If the fielder is over bounded by overthrow or something deliberate ... the boundary will be added and the batsmen have scored together, even if they are already crossing each other during the throws."
The end of the law took the pitch. The video replay of the incident clearly shows that while bowling Guptill, England's two batsmen Ben Stokes and Adil Rashid did not cross each other for the second run. That means when Guptill was bowling for the throws, Stokes was on the edge of nonstreak and Adil Rashid was on the edge of the striker. That means running 2 runs, 1 runs and with boundaries - 5 runs total. The question arises because of the ambiguity of the law. Because, as far as the fielders have not said anything clear from the throws, there is nothing clear about the role played by the batsmen in the whole process. Guptill was thrown but the wicketkeeper was always there. It is overthrown due to the batsmen's batting.
New Zealand captain Kane Williamson said about the incident after the match, "It's a shame that the ball is in Stokes's bat. However, I hope that this kind of thing does not happen at that moment. "Whatever happens, if England win 5 over Gapital Oversro, the result of the match may have been different.
Needing the last 3 to win the match England needed 9 runs. In this situation, Martin Guptill threw Ben Bucknor's limelight with Ben Stokes. And the batsmen ran two runs and the umpire added 6 runs to the scoreboard. It started with debate
Pretense finals? World Cup is the best finale in the history of cricket? Whatever you can say, at the end of the game, but the real win cricket. Such an exciting match will definitely make the cricket market more prosperous. It is also a match on the stage like the World Cup final, where the run-out or wicket-keeper did not settle. At the end of the 100 overs, the two teams are equally equal. Even at the super end! Ah, what an epic final!
The Super Over was a match tie based on the boundaries of the title, where England won the title ahead. And the heart has won New Zealand However, the debut of debut was born in this match of tension, and it was in the last over of England's innings, with 1 run.
England needed 9 runs from the last 3 balls. Ben Stokes has wanted to steer the fourth ball of Trent Boult to a deep midwicket. Martin Guptill did very well. Maybe it was possible to run out of the stumps directly. He gave Dive to Stanka in the race. The ball crossed the third man with his bat! It was only after seeing the whole episode and the apologetic apology of Stokes, that he had no intentional hand because of the boundary. Absolutely unintentional happened.
In any case, in discussions with the team's fellow umpire, the umpire Kumar Dharmasena gave a signal of adding 6 runs (Runs 2 runs and 4 over) to the scoreboard. England have got the chance to return to the match. Turn to match 3 runs from 9 runs in the equation 2 came off 2 balls. Then the rest of history
But the debate is going on with the umpire's 6 runs. Analysts question from the media, that's not 6 runs, 5 runs? And this has given the scope for questioning of Article 19.8 of the Act of 'fielders overthrow or deliberate work'. It has been said, "If the fielder is over bounded by overthrow or something deliberate ... the boundary will be added and the batsmen have scored together, even if they are already crossing each other during the throws."
The end of the law took the pitch. The video replay of the incident clearly shows that while bowling Guptill, England's two batsmen Ben Stokes and Adil Rashid did not cross each other for the second run. That means when Guptill was bowling for the throws, Stokes was on the edge of nonstreak and Adil Rashid was on the edge of the striker. That means running 2 runs, 1 runs and with boundaries - 5 runs total. The question arises because of the ambiguity of the law. Because, as far as the fielders have not said anything clear from the throws, there is nothing clear about the role played by the batsmen in the whole process. Guptill was thrown but the wicketkeeper was always there. It is overthrown due to the batsmen's batting.
New Zealand captain Kane Williamson said about the incident after the match, "It's a shame that the ball is in Stokes's bat. However, I hope that this kind of thing does not happen at that moment. "Whatever happens, if England win 5 over Gapital Oversro, the result of the match may have been different.
